Doea a dividend policy matter Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Doea a dividend policy matter - Essay Example But the practitioners are of the opinion that dividend policies do play an important role in this regard. They provide examples in this regard that there are numerous companies whose share prices have jumped to a new high after their announcement to pay regular dividends. The process of paying dividend by companies is considered very important because it sends a powerful message to outsiders of the company about the future prospects of the organization. If an organization is able to pay out consistent dividends over time to its shareholders, it can be concluded by the general public that the fundamentals of the organization are very strong. It should be noted in this regard that focusing solely on the dividend policy of an organization is not sufficient. The company must also have the money that is required to pay dividends to its shareholders. Any company’s sources of funds must equal its uses of such funds. If an organization pays dividends to its shareholders and this is considered as use of funds, there must be something that has to change in the uses and sources statement. In this regard it could be said that given the investment policy of the firm, the dividend policy decisions of any firm is dependent on the choice of its financing strategy. An organization has to take a decision in this regard whether it wants to rely heavily on external funds to finance its projects and then paying back those funds to the providers of finance in the form of higher dividends. The other way is to retain a part of its earnings to finance its growth. Ploughing back of profits is an important tool by which an organization ca n effectively finance its projects without relying too much on outside sources of funds (Miller, 1977, pp. 261-265). It can be said at this point that generous dividend policies may not be considered as the best for an organization. The organization’s

What is the difference between 'old' and 'new' social movements Essay

What is the difference between 'old' and 'new' social movements illustrate your answer with reference to specific movements - Essay Example Social movements are created through a course of action, starting with disorder or campaigns as a response to a social problem, then organization of involved parties. People mobilize, leadership develops, duties are assigned, the public is notified, and guidelines or strategies begin to form, resulting finally in the establishment of the movement (Polletta & Jasper, 2001, 283). The course of action is not easy and there could be a decline phase in the group when it either disintegrates or is restored in a changed form. Social movements could be either reactive, involving opposition to change, or enthusiastic, with an aim for social change (Rootes, 1990, 10). Proactive social movements that aspire to reform a particular feature of human conduct, like the Women’s Christian Temperance Movement, are transformative (Polletta & Jasper, 2001, 283); those aspiring for an absolute transformation of individual conduct, like religious fundamentalist groups, are liberating (p. 283). The emphasis of the other two kinds is societal transformation: movements with goals of altering a particular feature of society, as represented by labor groups, are alterative, and organizations trying to transform the whole social order are revolutionary (Rootes, 1990, 12). The objective of this essay is to discuss the distinctions between ‘old’ and ‘new’ social movements. Theorists of new social movement observe a greatly reformed social structure behind these new social movements, diversely referred to as ‘postindustrial’, ‘network’, or ‘information society (Pichardo, 1997, 411). In the theory of Melucci (1994, 105), ‘modernization’ has obliged that individuals be able to process or understand the informational or network components on which present-day societies rely on, but heightened individualism has been escorted by great demands toward standardized conformity. On the other hand, the theory of